My apologies for not posting much on the blog recently. My book Municipal Dreams: the Rise and Fall of Council Housing was published by Verso in April and things have been hectic since then. I’ve more posts in the pipeline – on Nottingham, Hull, Thetford, Liverpool and London but just need to find the time to complete the research and write them up. Guest posts from people with expertise in their local area are also still very welcome.
In the meantime, there have been some great reviews for the book – from Lynsey Hanley in the Guardian, Rowan Moore in the Observer, Hugh Pearman in the Spectator and Edwin Heathcote in the Financial Times amongst others. And lots and lots of media interest – I’ve been on ‘You and Yours’ on Radio 4, on BBC Radio Scotland, BBC Radio Wales, BBC Radio London and local radio stations in Hull and Newcastle with Lancashire and Leeds forthcoming. I also did a slot on Sky News and recorded an interview for BOOKTalk on BBC Parliament. I’ve done talks on the book to groups in London, Manchester and Nottingham with more coming up across the country.
So that’s my excuse but, if that comes across as self-important, I want to say two things. Firstly, a big thank you to everyone who has read and supported the blog since it began over five years ago. Your interest helped the blog succeed – it’s had over 960,000 views to date – and the book which followed would not have been possible without you.
Secondly, that welcome for the book and media interest tells us that its subject-matter is timely and important. This reflects, I think, both a very broad concern over the current housing crisis and an increasing belief that a significant programme of public housing is needed to solve it. People are hungry for a positive (but open-eyed) narrative of council housing which records its past achievements and testifies to its potential.
Nearly all the interviews have revolved around three key questions.
One, ‘why council housing?’ The simple answer is that the private sector has never been able or willing to supply decent affordable housing on the scale required, not in the nineteenth century, nor today.
Two, ‘what went wrong?’ I will always challenge the premise and prejudice of that question; beyond the stigmatising stereotypes, so much didn’t go wrong for so many. But I also try to explain what did change and how, in many ways, council estates are better understood as the victim of that change rather than its agent.
Three, ‘can we build again?’ The answer, of course, is ‘yes’. We have built huge numbers of decent council homes in the past when the country was poorer than it is at present, sometimes in periods of genuine austerity. We have the means to build; we require the political will and vision.
In an interview with Forbes Magazine, I made the economic case for a renewed programme of public housing as both an investment in our people and their well-being and as an essential part of any broader housing market. Currently, we choose to subsidise an inefficient market system and private landlordism. Investment in secure, decent and affordable social housing would improve the lives and well-being of millions and in the longer-term, pay for itself. In the shorter term, it might – as the tragic case of Grenfell Tower reminds us – save lives.
And that brings us back to the moral case for properly funded and resourced public housing, as compelling now as it was when the long, proud story of council housing began in the mid-nineteenth century.
John, it was a pleasure hearing you speak at the Five Leaves Bookshop talk in Nottingham on 16 May. Hope you enjoyed the next day exploring some of the city’s housing and riding on a 35 of course. I’m sure that at some point you will touch on the New Lenton Nottingham City Homes development, which replaced five high-rise blocks and a small square of 1960s shops and flats (l lived within view of flats from 1979-2014 and The Guardian gave me no strings attached funding for ‘A Down to Earth’ flats project in 2007). You and Lynsey Hanley are great ambassadors for the cause of municipal housing.
Robert,
It was lovely to meet you in Nottingham and thank you very much for your kind words. I did get to see the new Lenton scheme – Dan Lucas had given me a tour that very afternoon in fact. The no 35 bus tour (with the tram back to the centre) worked out very well – a bit whistle-stop but lots of very interesting housing and on an impressive scale overall. I’m hoping to write something on the blog. Of course, the Nottingham history has already been written but I’d like to publish some of the photographs at least with a bit of text and explanation.
All the very best,
John
Looking forward to reading my copy, duly ordered from a proper, high street Independent Bookshop and not a ‘non-tax paying conglomerate’.
I have a large collection of Municipal Housing ‘Tenants Handbook’s from Boroughs around the country, 1950s & 1960s. They provide a fascinating insight.
Yes, they’re a great resource. I’ve looked at quite a few in the British Library. Thanks for buying the book – I hope you enjoy it. John
Hi John I will be getting the book. Two things. I am doing a piece on Bruno Taut and the Berlin Siedlungen where he was responsible for about 12,000 units.
1. Do you by any chance have any similar figures on other architects? 2. I have been thinking about economic theory in that context in that context of the Berlin tenements. It seems to me that in a free economy lowest wages are set at a level which may provide accomodation at the cheapest level, ie tenement. Public housing will never compete unless there is a public policy subvention, probably related to income. Does that make any sense?
Finally in a different context. where there is no potential for public housing subsidy the state should find a way of providing basic amenities, eg water, drains and electricity, leaving the resident to provide the home itself – it would be interesting to look at the favellas.
The latter two may sound completely bonkers so I apologise and not for publication!
Best wishes
Richard Henchley
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Municipal Dreams wrote:
> Municipal Dreams posted: “My apologies for not posting much on the blog > recently. My book Municipal Dreams: the Rise and Fall of Council Housing > was published by Verso in April and things have been hectic since then. > I’ve more posts in the pipeline – on Nottingham, Hull, Thetford,” >
Dear Richard. Thanks for your comment. Re Taut and other Berlin architects, have you seen my posts on the city?
https://municipaldreams.wordpress.com/category/berlin/
If they don’t answer your specific question, some of the sources referenced might be useful though you may well have come across them in your own research already.
Re your second point, I think it’s true empirically that public housing rents are almost invariably higher than those of the competing slums. This probably reflects the quality of the former as much as any market calculus though I accept your overall argument. In this sense, public housing requires a form of subsidy – either in construction costs or via some system of rent rebates or allowances.
On self-build, you might be interested in the example of Walter Segal a little closer to hand in the London Borough of Lewisham.
Best wishes, John
Thank you for this blog sir. I stumbled upon it while researching affordable state funded housing and I was surprised to learn that somebody way back when thought of giving the lower strata aesthetically sound and functional spaces to live in. It made me wonder if the affordable housing schemes in India could sometime in the future be expanded to our villages and smaller towns where the people pulling themselves out of economic misery could be given functional aesthically pleasing and safe housing by the government.
Thank you, Asmita. The UK didn’t get everything right but the best of its affordable public housing is definitely something to emulate. Best wishes, John
Congrats. Looking forward to reading it!
Hi just ordered book and looking forward to reading it, amazing site , and public housing and buildings are iconic to british History and should be preserved