Tags
‘Decent people living on a decent estate’ – that’s how Carole Bell, a Meadow Well community activist wanted people to think of the Estate in 2012. Unfortunately for her, they were more likely to remember the riots that ripped the community apart in September 1991 and the stigma attached to the Estate before that crisis and for some years after. There’s much that’s been written on Meadow Well before the riots and since, most seeking to explain its poor reputation and troubled history. This post will examine and assess those accounts and look at what’s happened on the Estate since then.
With apologies to Carole Bell, I’ll begin by recounting the Estate’s crisis point – those 1991 riots, sparked by the death of two young local residents, Dale Robson and Colin Atkins, killed when the stolen car they were driving careered off the road during a police pursuit. (Police claims that there was no ‘hot pursuit’ – that they were half a mile from the crash site – were disbelieved by many locals.)
The graffiti shows the version of events believed by many young people on the Estate
The protests which followed rapidly degenerated into looting and arson; emergency services attending were attacked. In all, it was said that some 400 people were involved; 37 were arrested.
Images of the riots and their aftermath
In the aftermath, the Estate became a focus of national concern – belatedly, it might be claimed – and international interest. Much has happened and a lot has changed since but let’s examine a very specific housing history first.
Meadow Well (also called Meadowell, interchangeably as far as I can tell) was part of the County Borough of Tynemouth, formed in 1849. This was an unusually mixed borough, comprising the resort of Tynemouth, large areas of middle-class suburbia as well as the working-class and industrial district of North Shields. While Lib-Lab politics dominated before 1914, for most of its life the Council (dissolved into the Metropolitan District of North Tyneside in 1974) was under the control of Independents and Conservatives.
That politics (and the fact that in 1912 two-thirds of councillors had interests in the private housing sector) might explain the Council’s reluctance to build before the First World War. A housing scheme proposed on land acquired at Balkwell Farm in 1912 was opposed by Conservative councillors. Councillor Plummer thought that to ‘put houses on the market at a rent nobody could compete with was not fair to the owners of property…The scheme was not at all fair to the middle class people’.
Ropery Banks, Clive Street, 1933
When others raised the appalling housing conditions and high death rate of the Banksides area of North Shields, Alderman Coulson, a Tory builder and landlord, blamed: (2)
the filth and dirt people live in. This is the evil, not the condition of the house. Put some of these people into Alnwick Castle and by the time they have been there one month it will be a slum.
These views are not merely of quaint historic interest, of course. Similar views – that council housing is subsidised by the better-off (though it isn’t), that inflated market rents are somehow sacrosanct, and that council tenants are feckless – inform a lot of current thinking around social housing and its residents.
Housing on the Balkwell Estate
In 1919, however, even Tynemouth’s councillors were swept up in the national drive to build ‘homes for heroes’. The Council determined that 1746 new council homes were required to address the Borough’s housing needs in the next three years and the Balkwell scheme was revived. Its early phases, built under the generous terms of Addison’s 1919 Housing Act, represented deliberately high-quality working-class housing and, by the end of the 1920s, the Estate would comprise 562 two-three bedroom houses, semi-detached or in short terraces, and 100 flats.
Corner of Oswin Terrace and Balkwell Avenue, the Balkwell Estate
There was no intention that this housing be let to the Borough’s poorer residents: (3)
it would be the height of folly to leave a skilled artizan and highly worthy citizen in his present cramped and inadequate home in a dingy street, a home which he fain would leave for one better and for which he would willingly pay a higher rent, and to build houses of a type superior to it, and let them at utterly disproportionately small rents to the dwellers in slumdom.
The intention – in a filtering up theory that was common among early housing reformers – was that the homes vacated ‘would be at once occupied by persons now living in houses of a still more inferior character’.
Meanwhile, the Borough’s housing efforts rapidly faltered. In fact, only 524 homes were built by 1922, some 924 by the end of the decade. The Council had even disbanded its Housing Committee in 1928 but it was re-established in 1930 as central government’s second interwar housing drive – slum clearance – took off.
Union Stairs, North Shields, 1933
Whether as a result of national pressure or local politics (Communist agitation was strong in the Banksides), the Council responded. Alderman Coulson’s earlier views notwithstanding, the necessity was pressing. A 1933 enquiry into what became the Clive Street Clearance Area revealed that 48 residents occupied 17 rooms in Union Stairs, sharing a single water tap. Liddle Street’s 405 residents enjoyed (if that’s the word) one earth privy for every 11 people. Only two homes had piped water; none had baths. Infant mortality stood at 143 per 1000 compared to the Borough average of 83. Across the Borough, ten per cent of housing stock was declared to be slum property. (4)
Cutting the first sod on the Ridges Estate, 1932
A five-year plan drawn up in 1930 projected the construction of 850 new council homes. In 1932, the Council purchased a 135 acre greenfield site on the north-western fringes of North Shields from the Duke of Northumberland. This was to be the Ridges Estate – the original name of Meadow Well and one by which it is still sometimes known.
The new estate contained 1961 homes. Forty of these were old people’s bungalows, 268 were self-contained houses and 1653 (84 per cent) were so-called Tyneside flats, common in the area – two-storeyed dwellings with flats top and bottom and separate ground-floor front doors, built in blocks of four.
An early image of the Estate showing wide, curved and tree-lined streets
In contrast, only around 15 per cent of the Balkwell Estate was flatted and, in real terms, it had cost twice as much to build. The Ridges was said to be poorer quality housing built on the cheap. These lower standards and the reputation which attended them have been described as ‘the source of all subsequent difficulties’ on the Estate and, of course, it is the design characteristics of council estates that have been claimed as a major factor in the emergence of later social problems. (5)
There is some truth in this explanation. The Balkwell Estate remained a more popular and highly thought-of development; the stigma of Meadow Well’s poorer housing persisted. But, in broader terms, the explanation is at best insufficient. National legislation had mandated lower quality council housing since 1923 and more so in the 1930s as the focus turned to rehousing slum dwellers. In this Meadow Well was not notably atypical and, to be valid, the explanation of later disorder would have to hold true for many estates across the country which manifestly it does not.
Children playing on the Estate, 1976
In practice, the layout of the Estate paid some tribute to the earlier superior cottage suburbs in its ‘Garden City’-style crescents and cul-de-sacs and it represented a good home to its new residents. As one of these, Sarah Redpath, recalls: (7)
When I went into that house and saw the bathroom and all that, well, I just broke down; I couldn’t help it because it was such a pleasure to know we were getting to where we were. It was marvellous. It was a lovely place; everyone had their gardens done, no fighting, no animosity amongst anybody.
Conversely, the Estate had none of the ‘design disadvantage’ Alice Coleman cited to explain antisocial behaviour in the 1980s – high-rise blocks, anonymous walkways, lack of ‘defensible space’, and so on. If Coleman’s monocausal account of later problems is mistaken (she really was only interested in attacking modernist design), we need to look at what else might have ‘gone wrong’ at Meadow Well.
Even this later image of the blighted Estate shows little ‘design disadvantage’
Another explanation – also used more widely to account for ‘problem estates’ – seems superficially more credible: that the Estate was, from the outset, a ‘dumping ground’ for ‘problem tenants’. This was, after all, the ‘rough’ working class, decanted from the poverty-stricken Banksides, and the sea-faring occupations of many male heads of household left the Estate’s womenfolk to cope alone, effectively as single mothers.
The symbol and, to outsiders, confirmation of these rough origins was the fumigation of the furniture and effects of all incoming tenants but even this needs scrutiny. Ann Hodgson, a long-term resident of the Estate, understood the stigma of this compulsory cleansing and how others looked on it, but she welcomed it as (in literal terms) a fresh start.
Contemporary reports also describe a very different estate than the one the early stereotype would suggest – this from a reporter from the Shields Daily News in May 1934:(8)
I had a thorough walk around the Ridges estate, the sun was shining…and the atmosphere was full of optimism. The first resident I decided to have a few words with…invited me inside the living room to have a look at the house. The room was neatness itself with new furniture in the best of taste.
In the same year, the Borough’s Medical Officer of Health concluded that ‘the cleanliness and tidiness of the dwelling houses on the new estate more than confirms my opinion that slums are not the product of the inhabitants’.
These stills from An English Estate (1992) show a different image of Meadow Well than that which is typical
Statistical analysis also undermines the ready negative characterisation of the Estate and its people. Only 31 per cent of its displaced slum dwellers came from the Banksides; nor were seafarers disproportionately represented on the Estate. Even the crude measure of rent arrears – an indication of those unable or unwilling to pay – disproves the stereotype: the arrears of Meadow Well tenants were just 0.4 per cent higher than the Tynemouth average.
From this careful analysis of fact rather than perception, Michael Barke and Guy Turnbull conclude that what the Estate did undoubtedly suffer from was labelling – an unjustified reputation generated in part by the resentment of others competing for the scarce resource of housing:
Regardless of the objective reality, a significant and influential body of opinion had already determined that the area was a ‘problem’ and was bound to be a problem because of the nature of the people who moved there and the nature of the areas they moved from.
We see some of the same dynamics in play in the Knowle West Estate in Bristol and the North Hull Estate.
If we reject the idea that Meadow Well suffered some Original Sin that would explain its later fall, we need to look more carefully at what happened to the Estate in the post-war period. We’ll do that in next week’s post.
Sources
Special thanks to Steve Conlan for providing and allowing me to use in this post and the next some of his fine images of the Estate taken in the late 1980s and early 1990s. You can see more of Steve’s work online here.
(1) Carole Bell interviewed by Mike Proud, ITV Tyne-Tees News, ‘Community hero retires 21 years after Tyneside riots’, 3 September 2012
(2) These quotations and much of the detail which follows are drawn from North Tyneside Community Development Project (CDP), North Shields: Working-Class Politics and Housing (1977). Documents from the North Tyneside CDP can be downloaded from the website of Purdue University, Indianapolis. The full collection of CDP records are held by the Tyne and Wear Archives.
(3) John F Smillie (Borough Surveyor, Tynemouth), ‘Some Thoughts upon Housing’, The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, September 1919; no. 4. vol. 40
(4) Details drawn from North Tyneside CDP, North Shields: Working-Class Politics and Housing and David A Kirby, The geography of inter-war (1919-39) residential areas on Tyneside: a study of residential growth, and the present condition and use of property, PhD, University of Durham, 1970
(5) The quotation comes from North Tyneside CDP, North Shields: Working-Class Politics and Housing.
(6) Michael Barke and Guy Turnbull, ‘Meadowell and Mythology: the Making of the “Problem Estate”’ in Bill Lancaster (ed), Working-Class Housing on Tyneside, 1850-1939. See also Barke and Turnbull, Meadowell: the Biography of an ‘Estate with Problems’ (1992)
(7) Interviewed in An English Estate, a Channel Four documentary from Hugh Kelly, broadcast in October 1992
(8) Quoted in Barke and Turnbull, ‘Meadowell and Mythology: the Making of the “Problem Estate”’ which also provides the statistical analysis which follows.
Like many council housing estates like the one I grew up on, Blackbird Leys in Oxford, once labelled as a ‘bad’ place the label sticks. Meadow Wells is no doubt no worse and no better than many other social welfare housing areas throughout Britain. Lack of employment and other social ills are the real culprits for such labelling.
It is a pity that the media do not confront these issues rather than concentrate on the negatives such as riots and anti-social acts of behaviour. Oh silly me that would not make such good copy!!
Most housing estate residents live full and active lives enjoying the areas where they live. Now retired and in my 60’s I remember that growing up on in Blackbird Leys in the 1960’s my mates and I enjoyed ourselves and went on to become produtive members of the community.
Its another pity that some ‘toffs’ still like to put people down.
Hold your heads high Meadow Well people.
Rant over until next time!!
Michael Norwood
Thanks for a great comment – I couldn’t agree more. If you haven’t seen it, I hope you think I’ve done Blackbird Leys justice with my post on it here:
https://municipaldreams.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/the-blackbird-leys-estate-oxford-never-part-of-the-city-proper/
Pingback: The Meadow Well Estate, North Shields II: ‘decent people living on a decent estate’ | Municipal Dreams
Well researched and interesting piece, sadly this labelling persists – a calssic case of ‘give a dog a bad name’!
Well I am proud to say i was born in the meadow well and still
Live there we are just ordinary people like every were else.you know who’s a stranger or not as the community look after one another.its like if some one ask were ur from n if u say meadow well they go omg but we are no different from any were else just cos of the riot in September 1991 doesn’t make us any different from any were else r.i.p Colin n dale I even went to skool wif Colin n in the same class all the way through he’s was a sound lad
As a boy I lived across the road from the Meadow Well estate in Chirton (Mill Street) and can honestly say that housing conditions in Chirton were far worse than anything in the Meadow Well.
Living in Mill street, outside privvies (many shared by other families) and certainly no bathrooms (a tin bath in front of the coal fire once a week if you were lucky), was the norm. The difference was most people living in Chirton were owner occupiers who took an interest and care of their properties.
Several relatives lived in flats on Avon avenue (Meadow Well) and we thought they were luxurious compared to the state we lived in!
I returned to North Shields just before the riots and was apalled at the condition of Meadow well. There was a palpable air of despair and, because I drove a newish car, I was viewed with suspicion and did not feel safe venturing out of its metal confines.
Several days later the riots erupted. Not wishing to take the car, I walked to the Robin Hood pub on Front Street. The air smelt of burning wood and rubber and the police presence was all too evident. Kids were chanting “Meadow Well is burning down, burning down”. I left a few days later, hopefully never to return. A thoroughly dispiriting experience.
The difference between me and my friends? (many who still live there) even though I went to the same rubbish school as most of them, I left the area ASAP and got myself an education – something that wasn’t possible in that pit of despondency
Thank you for taking the time to share that history – sad and heartfelt.
Great estate great people
My mam moved there from a bank side house as a toddler (late 1930’s) and left in the early 1970’s. She maintains that the estate was a pleasant place to grow up in. People were poor but there was no discord and it did not have a bad reputation. I’d say it was the 1970’s when the estate started to experience trouble and gained its bad reputation. Certainly by the 1980’s it was classed as a no go area for many people outside of it. I grew up on the Balkwell estate in the 1980’s and was not allowed to stray onto the Meadowell estate under any circumstances.
I lived on Laburnum Ave in the 60’s, never felt unsafe or ashamed of the Ridges. We were like 1 big family and neighbours were aunties and uncles, children played in the street until dark, playing bull rush. We stayed mostly in our street, never straying far! We were all poor, struggling families, some more than others.